The first part of the article „Dead Cities“, where the author discusses all the novelists, who have imagined the destruction of cities, reminded me of a documentary that I saw a couple of years ago. This documentary dealt exactly with what is described in these books: what happens to our cities in 50, in 100, in 500, in 1000 …etc. years, after humans have suddenly become extinct? It showed how nature slowly returned to the cities and took over. After 50 years there wasn’t too much damage to the building (humans had died of some kind of disease, so all the buildings and infrastructure were intact), but when time went on the wildlife took over and slowly the buildings turned into ruins. What surprised me back then, was that they showed that skyscrapers would be the first buildings to go (cause they’re largely made out of glass) and that the brick buildings would stand the longest. In the last sequence one could hardly see that there had been a city at all, all that was left were a few brick ruins.
So whether we humans survive or not, life continues even without us. To quote a famous movie scientist: “Life finds a way.”
Wednesday, February 25, 2009
Wednesday, February 18, 2009
Free Education
I’m now going back to the previous Solnit text here, but there is one point, that was mentioned in-class when we discussed the text, which I think is fundamentally true:
I think that, like someone said in class, that we only really protest or participate in demonstrations, when the cause for the demonstration affects us directly. If it affects our lives, we’re more likely to go out onto the streets and do something about it.
I have a relatively recent (meaning last year) experience with demonstrations myself, when the government introduces tuitions fees (we don’t have these in Germany) of about 500€ at my home university in Germany. Thousands of students of my home university (me included) came to together to demonstrate for a FREE EDUCATION. We blocked the streets of the city center by walking and sitting on them for hours, we took over one of the university buildings and even walked onto the Autobahn to disrupt the traffic there (which was quite dangerous and some students were arrested for that, so we stopped doing that). All the students signed a petition and consequently sued the government and when the term came along, where you actually had pay for the first time, many simply DID NOT pay (which could have gotten you expelled).
And this happened not just in my own university, but all over the state (and the other states, where they introduced tuition fees, which not all German states did). There were big demonstration in all major cities and the students from various universities all got together at one point to demonstrate in front of the parliament building in the state capital. And the students were not alone, but joined by professors, teachers, parents of future students…etc. This went on for months and months.
Now you may ask, was the demonstration successful? Well, we got a lot of national media attention and caused a lot of disruptions, which made sure that we were being taken seriously. However, the real reason why I would say, it was a successful demonstration, is that we actually achieved what we set out to do. After two terms the tuition fees were abolished and our universities are once again free. Unfortunately, it looks like the government will try to introduce the tuition fees again next year, so it may only have been a temporary success. However, if they do, the whole process is likely to start all over again, so I don’t know what is going to happen. As the saying goes: We’ll cross that bridge when we get there (or something like that).
I think that, like someone said in class, that we only really protest or participate in demonstrations, when the cause for the demonstration affects us directly. If it affects our lives, we’re more likely to go out onto the streets and do something about it.
I have a relatively recent (meaning last year) experience with demonstrations myself, when the government introduces tuitions fees (we don’t have these in Germany) of about 500€ at my home university in Germany. Thousands of students of my home university (me included) came to together to demonstrate for a FREE EDUCATION. We blocked the streets of the city center by walking and sitting on them for hours, we took over one of the university buildings and even walked onto the Autobahn to disrupt the traffic there (which was quite dangerous and some students were arrested for that, so we stopped doing that). All the students signed a petition and consequently sued the government and when the term came along, where you actually had pay for the first time, many simply DID NOT pay (which could have gotten you expelled).
And this happened not just in my own university, but all over the state (and the other states, where they introduced tuition fees, which not all German states did). There were big demonstration in all major cities and the students from various universities all got together at one point to demonstrate in front of the parliament building in the state capital. And the students were not alone, but joined by professors, teachers, parents of future students…etc. This went on for months and months.
Now you may ask, was the demonstration successful? Well, we got a lot of national media attention and caused a lot of disruptions, which made sure that we were being taken seriously. However, the real reason why I would say, it was a successful demonstration, is that we actually achieved what we set out to do. After two terms the tuition fees were abolished and our universities are once again free. Unfortunately, it looks like the government will try to introduce the tuition fees again next year, so it may only have been a temporary success. However, if they do, the whole process is likely to start all over again, so I don’t know what is going to happen. As the saying goes: We’ll cross that bridge when we get there (or something like that).
Thursday, February 12, 2009
The sentence that I remember most of all, from Rebecca Sonit’s Wanderlust: A History of Walking, is on page 216, where she writes: “The past becomes the foundation on which the future will be built, and those who honor no past may never make a future.”
I was struck by how much truth is behind this statement. How everything we do, all the places we visit and all the events that happen have a past, whether one know about it or not. The past matters, which is obviously when one considers how much time and effort people put into discovering the past. Not just historians or archeologists, but even ordinary people that want to find out about the family tree. People care so much about the past, because it helps us understand the present. The question of where we come from (meaning evolution and family history) helps us figure out, who we are and perhaps also what we want. And only when we have found a satisfactory answer (satisfactory for oneself), can we make plans for the future.
Also, a very important aspect is that people should, or at least try to, learn from their mistakes. If we know the reasons behind a dreadful event, we can try to avoid it. Basically, don’t do the same mistake twice, which is only possible, if we remember that a mistake has been made.
I was struck by how much truth is behind this statement. How everything we do, all the places we visit and all the events that happen have a past, whether one know about it or not. The past matters, which is obviously when one considers how much time and effort people put into discovering the past. Not just historians or archeologists, but even ordinary people that want to find out about the family tree. People care so much about the past, because it helps us understand the present. The question of where we come from (meaning evolution and family history) helps us figure out, who we are and perhaps also what we want. And only when we have found a satisfactory answer (satisfactory for oneself), can we make plans for the future.
Also, a very important aspect is that people should, or at least try to, learn from their mistakes. If we know the reasons behind a dreadful event, we can try to avoid it. Basically, don’t do the same mistake twice, which is only possible, if we remember that a mistake has been made.
Thursday, February 5, 2009
Walking here and there
After reading “The Solitary Stroller and the City” I would like to comment on two aspects of the article:
1.) I really liked the author’s description of what it feels like to come home to your hometown after being away for some time. I moved out of my hometown almost 5 years ago and lived abroad for a while and it really is a strange feeling to be returning home after that. You do “begin to see it as a stranger might”, because to some extend you have been made into stranger by all the new experiences and the changes in the city that have naturally occurred in the meantime. However, much has changed, it is still the same city and it remains your home. It will be the same when I go home after my time here in Canada.
2.) Walking around a city really has only two purposes. Either it is to get somewhere (in case of a business) or it about the walking itself (walking for pleasure). The author concentrated on the second kind of walking, so I will do the same. Walking in Edmonton has, at least for me, a different feel to it than walking in city in Germany. I admit that I’m not a big walker and don’t go on strolls unless forced to (which unfortunately for me happens quite often back home :-)) and I haven’t spent much time in the River Valley, but I still feel that Edmonton isn’t the friendliest town for walkers. Due to the grid system, you always have to walk next to a street (excluding the River Valley here, but that seems to be one of the only place) and the walker is constantly disturbed by the traffic (Edmonton really needs more crossovers of people on foot). In my home town you can walk at great length away from the traffic, because we have parks all over the place that are not just squares and actually connect the different parts of the city. There are also a larger number of back alleys that you can walk through undisturbed and where you can cut across and shorten the walk to a certain destination. There are underground walk ways so people can avoid the major streets or railways and or the can walk along the river. Here in Edmonton everything is laid out for being reachable by car (not a bad thing when you’re a driver) and as lot of space is taken up by smaller parking lots. At home, we tend to have one less but bigger parking lots and most of them are underground, so that they don’t take up any space. And we have more areas where there are no cars at all. In my hometown the city center (our downtown) is completely off limits for cars (well ok there are delivery cars, but they are only allowed into the center from 6am to 9am in the morning). It’s a wide open road where people walk, sit outside in front of cafes or go window-shopping without being disturbed by any car. You can enjoy walking there in the summer, especially if you do not walk in order to just to appreciate nature, which you can do enough in the parks. Last, but not least, walking here is different, because you see a lot less people walking in the streets. Walking is a lot more solitary here.
Now this is not at all meant as a critique, I’m only describing the differences I observes concerning walking in this city. As I said I’m not a big walker and thus couldn’t care less, about some of these aspects, but I know people who wouldn’t like walking in Edmonton at all.
1.) I really liked the author’s description of what it feels like to come home to your hometown after being away for some time. I moved out of my hometown almost 5 years ago and lived abroad for a while and it really is a strange feeling to be returning home after that. You do “begin to see it as a stranger might”, because to some extend you have been made into stranger by all the new experiences and the changes in the city that have naturally occurred in the meantime. However, much has changed, it is still the same city and it remains your home. It will be the same when I go home after my time here in Canada.
2.) Walking around a city really has only two purposes. Either it is to get somewhere (in case of a business) or it about the walking itself (walking for pleasure). The author concentrated on the second kind of walking, so I will do the same. Walking in Edmonton has, at least for me, a different feel to it than walking in city in Germany. I admit that I’m not a big walker and don’t go on strolls unless forced to (which unfortunately for me happens quite often back home :-)) and I haven’t spent much time in the River Valley, but I still feel that Edmonton isn’t the friendliest town for walkers. Due to the grid system, you always have to walk next to a street (excluding the River Valley here, but that seems to be one of the only place) and the walker is constantly disturbed by the traffic (Edmonton really needs more crossovers of people on foot). In my home town you can walk at great length away from the traffic, because we have parks all over the place that are not just squares and actually connect the different parts of the city. There are also a larger number of back alleys that you can walk through undisturbed and where you can cut across and shorten the walk to a certain destination. There are underground walk ways so people can avoid the major streets or railways and or the can walk along the river. Here in Edmonton everything is laid out for being reachable by car (not a bad thing when you’re a driver) and as lot of space is taken up by smaller parking lots. At home, we tend to have one less but bigger parking lots and most of them are underground, so that they don’t take up any space. And we have more areas where there are no cars at all. In my hometown the city center (our downtown) is completely off limits for cars (well ok there are delivery cars, but they are only allowed into the center from 6am to 9am in the morning). It’s a wide open road where people walk, sit outside in front of cafes or go window-shopping without being disturbed by any car. You can enjoy walking there in the summer, especially if you do not walk in order to just to appreciate nature, which you can do enough in the parks. Last, but not least, walking here is different, because you see a lot less people walking in the streets. Walking is a lot more solitary here.
Now this is not at all meant as a critique, I’m only describing the differences I observes concerning walking in this city. As I said I’m not a big walker and thus couldn’t care less, about some of these aspects, but I know people who wouldn’t like walking in Edmonton at all.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
